Sunday, October 18, 2015

Timelines and Peer Reviews When Designing Courses

Designing and creating your own online course can be a daunting task! I remember back to what my mother used to tell me. She would say, “You can put hard work and time into a project now to save time later, or you be lazy now and spend double the time later.” This quote has always stuck with me as I work on any type of project. No matter if it is working on projects around my house, at work, or for my college class, the amount of time and energy I spend up front truly dictates that amount of time I will have to spend later. Take for instance designing an online class. It is going to take a substantial amount of time to design the course so that those who participate can easily navigate and work through the lessons and activities without getting confused and/or frustrated. I have found in my experience of creating training sessions for teachers in my school district that I have to put about 3 times the amount of time into the creation of the training as is the length of the training itself. However, with adequate planning, in the end, my job as the facilitator becomes more streamlined which saves me time during and after the training.
As I have designed my online course for my master’s class this semester, I have also found that it is extremely time consuming to create the course so that it is easy to navigate and also has clear and concise instructions for the students. I have been fortunate to have a fantastic peer reviewer. She has been so detailed in her feedback to me on items that I might want to address. Questions she has raised about terms that I use within the instructions that she did not understand made me realize that if new teachers to our school district were to take my course, they may not understand these as well. As a result, I have tried to give more information within the instructions to explain these terms. Additionally, she has looked at the activities that I have created so far and she has had questions on due dates and how the collaborative pieces would work. This has also made me go back and rethink what I have written so that the students will have a better understanding.
As a peer reviewer myself, the work of my peer reviewer made me think more about the work that I reviewed. I could tell that my peer reviewer spent time watching my videos, looking over my assessment rubrics, and reading through step by step instructions that I created. With her great feedback on each of these, it made me do a better job when I looked over another students\’s work. I realized how much the peer review of my work helped me make a much better product. I want to have the same influence on the student that I peer review.

As I mentioned earlier, I spend a majority of my time at work preparing for upcoming trainings and meetings. Each of these requires a large amount of time to prepare so that they run efficiently. When thinking about a professional timeline for preparing materials, I feel that I am involved with this every day. Professional timelines make it so that there is usually not enough time in the work day to properly prepare. Many times, I have to spend hours outside of the work day to complete the tasks in preparation for the activities that are to come. However, I know that if I put the time and effort into the creation of my materials now, my training or meeting will go much smoother for my students and myself.

Sunday, October 11, 2015

Canvas LMS Structure and Instructional Design of a Course

As I have begun to design a course in Canvas for my Technology based Learning Environments master’s course, I feel that I have been at a slight advantage over my classmates. This year, our school district purchased the Canvas Learning Management System (LMS) for all teachers and staff to use. Although I never received any formal training, I have learned to use the system through the built in videos and documentation in Canvas. As a result, I have been training teachers on how to use the system for several months now.
With that said, as I worked on my instructional design document, I already had a fairly clear picture of what the Canvas LMS had to offer. I knew the structure of Canvas and how I could use the different pieces in the design of this course. Additionally, I have been able to share some of my knowledge with classmates for this course since the LMS was new to them. Although I do not know everything there is to know about Canvas, I know enough to create a course. Additionally, I learned a couple of things while conducting the peer review for my classmate. I did not realize that there are built in templates that can be used to get a course started. Knowing this will help me with teachers in my district that have a tough time figuring out the organization for their course.
The design model of Canvas is working great for me. I am dividing my course up into Modules that the participants will work through. I have set up the modules with pre-requisites so that students must work through them in sequential order. However, students can always go back to previous modules to review content if needed. Since this course will be offered to my teachers over a 10 week period, this will help me in facilitating the course while it is in progress.

Canvas is a very user friendly atmosphere for both the designer and the student. Additionally, the Help documentation and videos are easy to access and understand. If I have any questions at all, I can quickly find answers to them. The only thing I have found so far that I would like to see enhancements made is in the rubrics. First, the rubric does not align the rating columns as you add additional ratings to the rubric. It really bothers me that they do not line up. However, the interactivity while grading student assignments makes it easier for me to forgive this issue. Furthermore, the rubrics cannot be shared with other teachers or colleagues through the Commons area. This has been a major frustration for our teachers. They would like to be able to share these rubrics with each other. I have sent in an enhancement request to Canvas. I hope they receive enough requests to make this a top priority for future upgrades.

Saturday, October 3, 2015

Reflection on Instructional Design in Canvas

Creating content in a learning management system can take time. As I work with teachers, the one barrier that so many feel they cannot overcome is the amount of time it takes to create the course. However, one must look at how the pedagogical transformation will enhance the learning environment for the students (Bowen & Lack, 2012). In Castleberry ISD, we are using Canvas LMS as we begin to transform the learning environment to a blended learning environment. However, this can look daunting to a teacher that has never reaped the benefits of a blended learning environment.
As I have begun to build my course in Canvas for my master’s course at UNT, I have seen that the task is overwhelming at first. So far, the instructional design and the organization in Canvas have both gone very smoothly. I have already organized my learning modules and have begun to enter the content. I really like the rubric builder where I can create interactive rubrics to go along with assignments, discussions, and quizzes. As I move forward in my development of the course, I will be embedding screen-cast videos and other web 2.0 applications into the content. The ability to embed this content will help students be able to work through the modules without having to leave the course to find the resources.
The challenging part of creating the course has been the amount of time it takes to create quality learning modules online. However, this is not something new to me. I know that when I am creating training modules for work, I can spend days working on a training that is going to be an hour and a half. What I have found in the past is that the more time and energy that I put into the development of the course, the smoother the training goes, and my students are much more successful in completing the course. All in all, I have not found the creation of the different applications in Canvas to be challenging. Canvas is very user friendly and if there are areas that I cannot figure out, the documentation they provide in their support section has been very beneficial.
I look forward to this next week when one of my classmates will be doing a peer review of what I have already created in my course. Having the peer reviewer look over my course this early in the development will certainly help as I continue to develop the course. I also look forward to reviewing the course for my peer. Not only do I look forward to providing them with constructive feedback, but I also hope to gain more insight into how Canvas can be implemented for online learning.
Reference

Bowen, W. G., & Lack, K. A. (2012). Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. Ithaka SandR. Downloaded April, 10, 2012.